The 9-11 Pentagon silence is thunderous! Witnesses provide identities of persons and a
timeline for the physical evidence of an event - yet the physical evidence just doesn’t support more than a very few of the
witness claims to the Pentagon event. Too many witness accounts are severely lacking in physical evidence. Viable
corroboration among the different witness reports is conspicuously absent. No one seems to notice. For all that was seen, the
reports too prominently lack what should have been heard.
As with all of 9-11, the Pentagon account loudly speaks to a cover-up; what more can be said
for the truth that only God knows. What is missing speaks more loudly, than that which is present. See the video demonstration
at the bottom of this page of a 757 landing to see why the sound missing from witness reports is significant. Turn up your
volume and imagine not remembering that. This aircraft is at about 1/3 of the power level and speed of the alleged Pentagon
aircraft. Watch it turn and the end of the runway to get a sense of the size and then imagine it vanishing two seconds
later with no trace.
The pre-collapse photos of the Pentagon are clearly missing any obvious suggestion of
forward-moving damage. That can’t be true, if any aircraft was involved. The ‘official’ fireball and ‘757’ security
video taken from the Pentagon guard shack appears to be a fraud. This is evidenced by the displaced time-date stamp
(a day and a half late) and the fact that the Pentagon lawn was unburned in later photos of that same lawn. The grassy
area in front of the collapsed section should have been browned, at a minimum; if not blackened and pitted from the
intense explosion allegedly shown in the video frames. One witness passionately claimed that he ducked the wing of
Flight 77; a few yards from the Pentagon – disregarding the effect the ‘official’ fireball would have had on him.
He also forgot important details that no one could ever forget – the sound of the roaring engines and the force,
heat and distinct smell of jet exhaust.
A major weakness in the 757 argument is that the purported aircraft would have encountered
a cushion of air known as “Ground Effect", which would physically cause an aircraft that size at that speed to remain above 50 feet,
minimum, unless the nose was lowered to such an extreme as to plow a ditch in the grass leading up to the photographed external
damage. The objects in this area were also undamaged, such as the electrical cable spools.
Another impossibility comes in the claims of the “struck” light poles. At a minimum, they would
have been violently hurled by the velocity of an aircraft doing 345 mph, with very prominent associated damage to the lawn and
surrounding objects like vehicles. Instead, they are found within feet of their original mountings. One pole self-stacked its two pieces,
one upon the other. Still another toppled in the opposite direction of the purported flight path – falling away from the Pentagon.
Yet another photographically documented light pole ‘gently’ landed in the windshield of a taxi cab, only damaging the glass
windshield but not the hood or the window frame. The driver’s face wasn’t even cut by flying glass. The closure rate of the
cab and light pole should have been in the magnitude of at least 150 mph. Clearly, the physical damage in the photos doesn’t
even remotely suggest such an event.
Another witness reported the stench of kerosene, from the aircraft jet fuel – which
actually would have smelled like diesel. What of the factual evidence? Where are the highly obvious expected descriptions
and statements?
The factual 9-11 Pentagon damage is historic – up to a point. The reported seismic data says
that nothing happened; not in the vicinity of the official event time of 9:38. Two stopped Pentagon clocks point to approximately 9:31, as
do a variety of other reports and quotes. The dog didn’t bark on cue. Seismic monitors are sensitive enough to pick up a sonic
boom; yet they didn’t detect anything representing an aircraft impact at the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11?
That’s just not possible. The chance of discovering the factual 9:31 seismic data today is highly unlikely. By now it
is in the vault of “National Security” at a minimum.
When you examine the fire rescue reports, the official timing of the fire trucks is approximately
3- 5 minutes. That timing is too suspicious to be taken seriously. To think that the Reagan International Airport fire vehicles
could reach the Pentagon in 5 minutes lacks any measure of credibility. Especially in the heavy morning traffic that was brought
to a standstill from the events occurring at the Pentagon. However, if the factual time of the 9-11 Pentagon event is 9:31; then the
arrival times of the responding fire rescue vehicles becomes radically more realistic.
According to Lee Evey, Manager for the Pentagon Renovation Project:
“All of those materials working together helps reduce damage to the building and to its occupants. And in fact
the building stood for approximately 35 minutes after impact by the aircraft before collapse occurred. As a
result, that 35 minutes, critical minutes, allowed people within the building an opportunity to escape. Had we
not had that additional 35 minutes, the total of injury might have been much higher than it was.”
That statement is typical of the elapsed time descriptions during the days directly after 9/11, but in stark contrast
to the later published official time of 19 minutes between the impact and the building collapse.
Indicative of a cover-up?
The pictures taken of the heliport building show shrapnel damage. The burned remains
of a nearby construction trailer were photographed where they fell in front of the Pentagon wall. They were not driven
up against the building by any forward-moving force, let alone an aircraft traveling at 345 mph. The trailer damage
suggests the possibility of explosives placed inside. When you add the lateral damage down the face of the building
and the unexplained fires in front of the pre-collapse building it gets more difficult to explain in terms of a 757.
A dramatic picture of the 9-11 Pentagon shows a jetting flame from an underground
utility bunker, presumably a broken gas main. BUT – how do you explain the underground line being broken, let alone ignited
since even the grass was not scorched or damaged?
The damage to the pre-collapse face of the building has intact obstructions, rendering
an aircraft strike at ground level impossible – even if you disregard “Ground Effect”. Yet, that is where the primary
damage is located – right at ground level. The orientation of the construction yard generator unit as shown in photos
taken directly after the event is wrong for the damage claimed. Even the location of the generator’s fire on 9-11 is
in the wrong location relative to an aircraft strike.
Supposedly, a fiberglass aerodynamic fairing and a fragile control actuating mechanism
gouged a perfectly ‘saw-cut’ channel in the roof of the generator. Relative to the photographed position of
the generator on 9-11 , the cut was nearly 90 degrees away from the claimed direction of aircraft travel. If such damage
had taken place the aircraft would have been rotated further to the right – making the official impact point
impossible. Again, the wing couldn’t have been that low – approximately 12 – 15 feet. Further, the official
report has the aircraft in a left bank, making the generator strike that much more unlikely. There was also no
debris left behind from the aircraft after these alleged high-speed collisions with very large, heavy objects.
Except for Rumsfeld’s statement in an interview with Parade Magazine indicating a “missile” hit the
Pentagon on 9-11, the physical evidence otherwise attests to explosives and thermal devices. Then add the mysterious fire-rescue
response. The Pentagon fire was knocked down in seven minutes; yet the Pentagon continued to burn through the night, with impunity.
No one said a word.
The Pentagon interior images of the un-collapsed portion of the building show a completely
blackened interior with destroyed reinforced concrete pillars approximately two feet square. The exposed mid-span rebar
doesn’t show impact damage, yet the concrete is destroyed to the spiral rebar core evidenced by the compressed vertical
bending of so many columns. Lacking any suggestion of an impact, that damage attests exclusively to an intense and unexplained heat.
Seven to ten minutes isn’t enough for any kind of conventional aircraft fuel to do such damage. The 9-11 WTC damage is
eerily similar. The intact Pentagon ceilings attest to the heat being short-lived and very localized.
The Pentagon exit hole in the A&E drive is almost perfectly round and lacks any physical
evidence of an object being pushed out through it. Any experienced military person would take one look at the exit hole
with one word in mind, “det-cord” (“detonation chord;” essentially an exploding rope). The images of the supposed
aircraft debris lack mass, compression damage or appropriate sooting and burning. They do however appear to be ‘weathered’ as though
taken from an aircraft bone-yard and conveniently placed for a photo shoot. Students of corrupt political history are
reminded of a similar plan in 1962 called “Operation Northwoods”. In that plan they elaborate on the planting of aircraft parts
to cover the scene that was actually caused by "radio triggered" detonations. They also discuss the use of
"plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots".
With an instant lust for 9-11 propaganda images against al Qaeda, the various videotapes of
the Pentagon events were grabbed by FBI agents and sealed to this day under the disguise of “National Security”. What is on
those tapes that they don't want us to see?
The pre-collapse photographs display undeniable violent damage to the Pentagon right
at the level of the construction trailers. One other fact to be aware of is that there were no construction personnel
on the location during normal work hours. There is no viable remnants of the purported 757 or any other type of aircraft.
Thus, the damage could only have been caused by explosives and thermal devices consistently in evidence at the Pentagon on
9-11. In any case, the evidence all points far away from the official story of a hijacked Flight 77 striking the Pentagon.
The ‘offset’ official forensic graphics cleverly mask the geometry of the purported 757 impact. We’re to believe that
the 757 wings “folded” on impact. Remember, from the photos, that the primary damage to the Pentagon face is at ground
level – impossible, by a 757 – especially in light of the obstructions; but there it is.
The exterior building damage is sideward, not inward. The widest possible “impact hole” to the Pentagon is on the order
of 15 feet wide. If one buys into the “folding wing” 757 angle, then there is no path, nor “reach,” for the aircraft
fuselage - or wing - to destroy the support columns of the collapsed portion. The purported impact area didn’t collapse - but
the non-impacted area DID collapse? Ten minutes of fire isn’t enough ‘ordinary’ thermal impact - including jet
fuel (not in evidence) - to do such damage. Exterior or interior, there is no viable suggestion of forward-moving
impact damage. 200 Knots, or 500 Knots; the damage just isn’t there.
Disregarding the needed (and impossible) flight path, no measure of damage accounts for the BASIC diameter
of a 757 fuselage – alone – not to mention wing, engine and tail damage. The widest damage simply doesn’t
allow for a Boeing 757.
In the necessary forensic sequence of events, if one can’t put a 757 through the front of the building – how did those interior
aircraft pieces arrive for the photo shoot? How did the building damage factually occur? The question is the same at the WTC
AND Pennsylvania.
For more information go to Ralph's 9-11 and the ImpossibleWEBSITE.
